Why Blood Work Is the Most Important Part of the Natty Plus Protocol

Why Blood Work Is the Most Important Part of the Natty Plus Protocol

Hormones5 min read

Summary

Every supplement influencer talks about what to take. Very few talk about how to know if it is actually working.

Every supplement influencer talks about what to take. Very few talk about how to know if it is actually working. That is the gap the Natty Plus Protocol was built to close, and it all comes down to one thing: blood work.

The Problem With Supplement Guesswork

Most people who take performance supplements have no idea whether those supplements are doing anything meaningful in their body. They rely on how they feel, how they look in the mirror, or how much weight they moved in the gym. These are all useful data points, but they are subjective, inconsistent, and easily influenced by a dozen other variables.

The supplement industry thrives on this ambiguity. When you cannot measure the effect, you cannot question the product. the natty Plus approach flips this on its head: if a compound is not producing measurable improvements in your biomarkers, it is not part of your protocol.

What to Test and When

A comprehensive Natty Plus blood panel should include the following markers, tested at three key points, baseline (before starting), mid-cycle (4-6 weeks in), and post-cycle (4 weeks after completing the protocol):

Hormonal Markers

Metabolic Markers

Organ Health Markers

How to read your Results

Having the numbers is step one. Interpreting them correctly is step two. Here are the principles that guide Natty Plus blood work analysis:

Trend matters more than any single reading. One elevated fasting glucose reading is not cause for alarm. Three consecutive elevated readings are a pattern that demands action.

Optimal is not the same as normal. Lab reference ranges are based on population averages that include sick, sedentary, and elderly individuals. A “normal” testosterone level of 350 ng/dL might be within range, but it is not optimal for a healthy, active man. natty plus protocols aim for optimal, not merely normal.

Context changes everything. Your fasting glucose reading means something different if you tested it the morning after a poor night of sleep and a late-night meal versus after a standard eight-hour fast. Always control for variables when possible.

When to Adjust or Stop

the whole reason for running blood work is to give you objective criteria for decision-making. Here are clear signals that a protocol adjustment is needed:

Ignore these and you are asking for problems. This is a direct application of the Tony Huge laws of biochemistry physics, you cannot argue with the data your own body produces. The numbers dictate the protocol.

Where to get Blood Work Done

Services like Marek Health, DiscountedLabs, and Quest Diagnostics offer direct-to-consumer panels that cover all the markers listed above. Many Natty Plus practitioners order the male Comprehensive Panel or equivalent, which typically runs between $150 and $300 USD. Given that you should be testing three times per cycle, budget for blood work as a core expense, not an afterthought.

Interesting Perspectives

While the core principles of biomarker monitoring are established, several emerging and unconventional perspectives are worth considering for the advanced practitioner:

The Bottom Line

Taking supplements without blood work is just throwing money at a wall and hoping something sticks. the natty plus protocol exists to bring precision to natural performance enhancement, and blood work is how you actually know what is working. No blood work, no protocol. Simple as that. For a complete, step-by-step manual on this process, refer to the Natty Plus Bloodwork Bible.

References
  1. Bhasin, S., et al. (2010). Testosterone Therapy in Men with Androgen Deficiency Syndromes: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. (Establishes the clinical significance of measuring total and free testosterone).
  2. Grossmann, M., et al. (2015). Low testosterone in men with type 2 diabetes: significance and treatment. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. (Highlights the relationship between metabolic markers like fasting glucose and hormonal status).
  3. Clemmons, D. R. (2004). Role of IGF-I in skeletal muscle mass maintenance. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. (Details IGF-1 as the critical downstream effector of growth hormone activity).
  4. Mulligan, T., et al. (2006). Prevalence of hypogonadism in males aged at least 45 years: the HIM study. International Journal of Clinical Practice. (Provides context for “normal” vs. “optimal” testosterone ranges in aging populations).
  5. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. (2001). Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. (Standard reference for lipid panel interpretation and cardiovascular risk).
  6. American Diabetes Association. (2021). 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021. Diabetes Care. (Defines diagnostic thresholds for fasting glucose and HbA1c).
  7. Kumar, R., et al. (2013). Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. Canadian Medical Association Journal. (A guide to interpreting AST/ALT elevations in a clinical context).

Education and personal experience only, not medical advice. 18+. Talk to a licensed doctor before you change anything about your health.

Read nextWhat Is the Natty Plus Protocol

Contents

Themes and settings

Size
Font
Spacing
Page